There is no point in dreams if they lack some measure of audacity.
It was January of 2000 and the world had survived the millennium bug. The place was Breckenridge, Colorado and a member of my wife’s family had a cabin near the ski resorts. There at the top of the mountain I got my first bit of instruction in the ancient art of skiing.
The first and last thing I heard was, “Lean forward,” and so I did. I began to slide down the mountain gaining speed. I had no way to steer and no idea what I should be doing. I found myself completely out of control and was headed towards the trees at increasing velocity. Before I painfully crashed I orchestrated a controlled wipe-out into the snow with poles, skis, and limbs all flying in different directions. The remainder of the day was a repeat of the same series of leanings forward with various wipe-outs. I got better instruction and learned how to stop by “snow-plowing”. By the end of the day I had learned how to turn and stop with the skis parallel.
Sometime ago I became interested in the study of incompetence and how incompetent people generally behave. Specifically I was interested in the meta-cognition of incompetence as studied by Justin Kruger and David Dunning who found that incompetent people were unable effectively to evaluate their own competence. This lack of ability to understand personal competence has been called the Dunning–Kruger effect and restated basically it means that incompetent people tend to overestimate their own level of skill.
Link to the study:
(For an academic study, this is riveting material to read especially as a researcher, teacher, or student of martial arts.)
Compare that to Carranza’s statement, “He who knows most doubts most.” Carranza adds the perfect corollary to the DK effect and uniting the two ideas has given me a basis for moving forward during difficult tasks. (As an example, when a prairie-born Okie is rolling down a mountain with skis tied to his feet.)
The point isn’t to belittle or slander incompetence; we’re all incompetent in some subjects. Instead, my goal was to develop strategies to understand and mitigate my own incompetence by reserving a healthy dose of doubt about my own ability and creating a series of tests to validate my own performance.
I am going to add my own rule which I learned in Breckenridge, “Lean forward.” We can paraphrase Voltaire to arrive at a similar statement, “Never let the perfect be the enemy of the good.” If I had become paralyzed with the fear of the many stumbles, spectacular wipe-outs, and public laughter at my misbegotten antics I might never have learned to ski that day.
We might best understand this as a Medio (or a virtuous mean or balance point as Aristotle and the Destreza authors might describe it). There is absolute perfection at one extreme. At the other extreme is complete incompetence. Between the two extremes is the good work we might do if we just lean forward and accept our imperfection.
We need to teach and practice La Verdadera Destreza to build our skill and to foster a community. But, we also know not all the work has been translated which should be a warning to us to preserve our doubts. Previous attempts have stumbled and fallen quite publicly. Worse, our mistakes may be mocked and picked apart and ridiculed by our peers.
1. Know that your ability to self-evaluate is shaky while you are learning.
2. Preserve a healthy doubt and create meaningful checks to ensure your work is good.
3. Lean forward and be ambitious unto audacity. Don’t let the fear of failure prevent you from producing work.
Like many of the stories of my life, this one should start with me being a fool. It was WMAW and assembled there were a collection of instructors trained through Maestro William Gaugler’s fencing program. The Chicago Swordplay Guild wished us to deliver to Maestro Gaugler a gift. Resting inside a carved box was a wooden gladius, a Rudis, of the kind which was traditionally presented to a gladiator who had earned his freedom to become a Rudiarius. Engraved were words expressing their desire that this tradition should persist forever.
At the time I thought it was merely a lovely gesture for his years of hard work but this was a young man’s thinking… it was a fool who could not see the message contained therein which we must all face as fencers, teachers, and members of a martial tradition. What I did not know was that Maestro Gaugler was dying and that his days of servitude to the tradition were ending.
In 1979 Gaugler started the San Jose Fencing Master’s Program which harkened back to an older expression of the tradition in which the inquartata and the passata sotto were still taught. It was taught as if the weapons had greater mass than the trainers themselves actually possessed. The parries emphasized defensive power over the quick ripostes favored in sporting competition. It was a school in which we were required to both percussively strike and then slice in our sabre cuts in order to lay open wounds we would never see. The sabre cuts circled from the elbow to generate enough force to deliver powerful cuts while withdrawing our forearms from the threatened space created when the weapon left the line of offense. It was heavily based on Parise’s work which was itself an attempt to protect the Italian tradition. In order to certify the Fencing Master’s program Gaugler brought masters from Italy to witness the exams and they did so expressing their admiration that he had created so authentically an Italian expression of the art.
Gaugler had created a time capsule waiting for the right moment to be opened. Outside of Gaugler’s Italian time capsule competitive fencing had moved in a different direction but a new movement lay on the horizon and the historical fencing community arrived at the end of the millennium. I had been working on historical traditions for over 10 years before I began studying under the masters that Gaugler had trained. The fencing master’s program was based on a martial system which was well-documented but even more compelling for me was a tradition of teaching which was largely unknown outside the school itself. As I began to train, my own understanding of the historical texts and my ability to transmit the material to students began to accelerate. Not only was my own practice getting better but my ability to train an effective historical Italian fencer had begun to blossom.
The Spanish Destreza author Carranza describes the early rudiments of knowledge as trying to write a letter while knowing only ‘A’, ‘B’, and ‘C’. Having found the Gaugler-trained masters I was awash in a rich language which I had never seen before and I was beginning to write fresh prose as I received the hundreds upon hundreds of touches from my students. Every lesson I gave changed the world in some small way and I was creating fencers who were both powerful fencers but also mastering a systematic way of approaching their martial tradition.
Gaugler’s insistence that lesson be the mirror of combat, that our classwork artificially preserve the mass of actual weapons, had created a clean bridge from the classical tradition into the earlier rapier work and the results were impressive. In my younger days I was a competitor in my fencing. I fought for the love I had of friendly play and the joy of the art itself. Fencing is so often an art form that lasts but for a brief shining moment which transcends all our human imperfections to create an instant of perfect time. What a joy it is to be there and to see the light it brings to the world.
Today I more often work on helping others to kindle their own spark. The day will come when I am held to task for what I did to preserve the traditions in my care. Did I create new and useful work? Did I train new fencers and teachers? Have I done everything in my power to ensure the tradition will persist forever?
I am a thing so well out of his place stumbling and making errors in my work as I strive to rebuild the Iberian traditions and protect the Italian ones. In that sense, being a fool is one of my strengths for I persist in striving regardless of my mistakes in the hope that I can do better. Being publicly wrong and taking the bruises required to correct my fumbling is a cost I will pay if it means the traditions endure. I am a fleeting, temporary thing but I am mindfully working to create a new generation of fencers and teachers who will carry the torch forward. The measure of my worth is not the adversaries I have defeated with my tradition but rather the students and teachers I have given to my tradition.
On December 10, 2011 William Gaugler died. Before the doors were closed on his program it had created 18 masters, 31 provosts, and 47 instructors. His gifted Rudis was a message from a grateful community to the Maestro; it contained a release but also a promise that we would carry his burden going forward so that the art would persist. Your work is done Rudiarius; rest easy.
Books by M. Gaugler
My lovely wife is pregnant with twins and the first trimester officially ends on Thursday, February 25, 2010. Of course, you want to see the pictures and I won’t deny you.
Here is the latest Ultrasound from this last Thursday:
Our twins at Week 11. (Click for High Resolution.)
Things seemed to be going fine with the Ultrasound when the doctor noticed some strange behavior.
Twin A turned to face Twin B so as to minimize his profile.
Fortunately, I was there and was able to interpret what was happening inside Mary’s tummy.
From Twin A's invitation in 4th, Twin B attempted to find the sword on the outside line in 3rd with his hand in 2nd. Twin A, executed a cavazione di tempo, but executed it as a feint. Twin B counterattacked in 4th only to be parried by Twin A in 4th who responded with a riversa to the outside cheek. Twin B eluded the cut to the outside cheek by lifting his hilt into Italian sabre parry of 7th and then in a sudden transition Twin B attempted to pass and seize the off hand of Twin A with a Spanish Movement of Conclusion. Perfectly in synch with Ettenhard's theory, Twin A eluded the circular footwork with circular footwork of his own and the phrase ended.
When Mary and I got back from Spain, we got our lives back into a semblance of order and then gave it our best shot. We got pregnant almost immediately and had a bit of a scare at 7 weeks when we thought we were out of the game for awhile.
We were scheduled for an emergency ultrasound and that’s when we discovered not only was Mary still pregnant, but that there were two little hearts beating in there. We’re incredibly happy and things are going very well for us now.
Because of the earlier scare, we have been keeping this quiet but with the first trimester ending next week we’re lifting the veil of secrecy. My blog has been remarkably quiet of late and that’s because a good deal of our effort has been consolidated into writing up our experiences as we go through the pregnancy on Mary’s blog. Until today, these entries have been password protected with only immediate family having access.
The due date for a typical pregnancy would be about September 9, 2010. With our twin pregnancy, we expect the twins to arrive sooner, sometime in mid August.
Mary’s Baby Blog
We’ve been blogging about the whole thing since we found out and you can read about it here:
If you want to read all the posts (which is not required by any stretch of the imagination), start on January 1, and use the calendar on the right to select the different dates.
We’re having a wonderful time working our way through the process.
LINK TO ARTICLE 1
LINK TO ARTICLE 2
LINK TO ARTICLE 3
LINK TO ARTICLE 4
Degrees of Strength in the Weapon
The amount of physical power you can exert with a sword varies along the length of the blade. The part of the blade closest to your sword-hand has the most mechanical advantage and the further you move away from your hand the weaker you become. The Italian system typically breaks the sword down into three parts; Strong, Middle, and Weak. The same will occur for any object held in the hands whether it is a longsword, rapier, or even a stick.
Leverage with Different Objects
While the Spanish understand this and often refer to the Strong and Weak as well, Carranza labels these parts as the Near, the Middle, and the Remote.
Carranza’s Philosophy… f.167 (1569, pub.1582)
|“Know that in the angle of the straight line, the sword has three parts. I mean that its numeration starts from the tip (as we will discuss later), and the strength increases as the numbers are multiplied until stopping in one of the centers. All this graduated quantity is divided in three equal sections with respect to the length, but they are unequal with respect to each one’s quality. You should be aware that the part next to the center’s strength is called near in this Art; the second portion, because it is between the strong and the weak and between the increase and the decrease, is the middle; and the last part is called remote.”
~Translated by Mary Curtis
Another method of describing the transition between weaker and stronger leverage is by numbering the sword into degrees of strength. This provides us with more information when describing engagements.
Image from Carranza’s Philosophy… f. 178 (1569, pub. 1582)
Carranza's Degrees of Strength (Click for High Resolution)
Notice that the blade is numbered from one, the weakest portion, to gradually higher numbers that indicate more strength. The effect of the notation is that higher numbers defeat lower numbers which is intuitive and easy to follow. These graduations of strength in the blade can provide an instructor with a greater degree of specificity when speaking with the student.
“Engage his 4 with your 6.”
“Shift the engagement from your 3 to your 8.”
Alonya's sword with the degrees of strength marked in tape for training
Carranza’s Leverage Demonstration
Carranza proves the mechanical advantage by applying a finger to the weakest part of a sword to demonstrate the combined effect of two different types of leverage working simultaneously.
Carranza’s Philosophy… f. 179 (1569, pub. 1582)
|“Then place the first finger of the four (called the index) on the tip of the sword at the beginning of the violent movement, and hold it firm, so that it makes two right angles with the sword. And I tell you all on behalf of the truth that even if many strong arms join together to move it from the place where the finger is, not removing it to the sides nor below, they will not move it. They will not be able to move it upward either nor make a violent movement with it upward in any way, as you all will see in this illustration that serves for the violent and natural movement.”
~Translated by Mary Curtis
DANGER: A Bit of Physics…
To understand Carranza’s illustration, we must first define torque. When physicists talk about the linear motion of an object, we can talk about forces acting on the object. For example, if I want to move a sword in a line, I can apply a force to the sword for a thrust. These forces might be gravity pulling the object toward the earth, a fencer lifting a weapon from a table, or a lunge pushing the weapon forward.
Just as a linear force moves objects in a line, torque rotates objects around a fixed point. When we wish to rotate an object we apply force to the object to achieve torque. The length of the object (or moment arm) affects how much torque we can achieve with a given force. The further from the point of rotation you can apply your force, the greater the torque applied. Just as you can use a longer wrench to unfasten a sticky lug nut, you can also achieve greater torque by engaging the adversary’s weapon further from the axis of rotation. In plain terms, pressure on the adversary’s weapon in the weak of the blade provides you with much more strength than engagement closer to his hand.
The Most Common Discussed Sword Lever
The weapon will act as a Second Class Lever when the entire arm is considered.
The Sword As a Second Class Lever Hinged at the Shoulder Joint. (The swordarm shown here is a reversed and edited image from Carranza's text.)
The axis of rotation might be the shoulder joint as shown here, or the elbow or wrist instead. Pushing at a 90 degree angle to the sword provides us the greatest amount of torque.
Without getting too deeply into mathematics, you can see that when you double the length of the lever, you also double the torque you can achieve with the same force.
- Torque = (1 foot) x (10 pounds) = 10 foot-pounds of torque
- Torque = (2 foot) x (10 pounds) = 20 foot-pounds of torque!!
- (Assuming that both are applied 90 degrees to the moment arm.)
This tells us that if we apply force further away from the shoulder in the weak of the blade we achieve greater torque than the same force applied to the strong.
You can demonstrate this in your own class by having your largest fencer grip a sword in one hand with an extended arm. Have the smaller fencer apply downward pressure to the tip with a single finger while the stronger one tries to lift the weapon from the shoulder. The large fencer will feel the torque in the shoulder because the entire extended arm and weapon becomes a Second Class Lever. If the large fencer tries to lift from the elbow or wrist, the torque will also be exerted there as well with pressure on every joint resisting the downward motion.
The Hidden Lever
There is another type of lever acting here as well that we can see by looking at Carranza’s image. In this image a heavy weight is suspended from the hilt and with a single finger we can lift it across an invisible fulcrum. What is the missing fulcrum?
Image from Carranza’s Philosophy… f. 179 (1569, pub. 1582)
Carranza's Illustration of Leverage Lifting a Heavy Weight (Click for High Resolution)
Carranza’s image provides us with an example of the sword as a First Class Lever. The finger on the blade’s weak lifts the heavy weight tied to the pommel with the unseen fulcrum being the hand of the fencer holding the weapon.
The Sword as a First Class Lever held by this left-handed swordsman.
The conflict between the fencer’s gripping force and pressure applied to the weapon is one of the mechanisms you might use to disarm an adversary. For example, in the previous article Carranza indicated that fingernails up is the weakest position of the hand. By applying downward pressure or a strong beat to the adversary’s weapon, you might be able to disarm your opponent. Salvator Fabris shows two possible disarms against an adversary in fourth (fingernails up) in plate 181.
You can demonstrate this in your own class by having your largest fencer grip a sword in one hand fingernails up. Have the smaller fencer apply downward pressure to the tip with a single finger. The strong fencer will feel an intense amount of pressure at the fulcrum point, and the smaller fencer will probably be able to push the tip downward. If this pressure is applied quickly and with force, it could result in a disarmament.
When Opposition Occurs Natural Defeats Violent
In a natural movement, the blade falls while in a violent movement it rises. According to the Spanish when two blades are in contact with equal degrees of strength, the fencer pushing downwards has the advantage over the fencer attempting to lift his weapon. The fencer pushing downwards can bring the weight of his upper body to bear into the engagement while the fencer resisting from below must rely solely on the muscles in the arm.
Pacheco argues that the Natural movement “…cannot be defeated by another, due to its noble nature,…” and Ettenhard echoes this.
Ettenhard in Compendium of the Foundations… p.89 (1675):
|“…and it is very clearly shown that he [don Luis Pacheco de Narvaez] said it because of the natural movement, since to it alone belongs the subjection, and in conclusion, it alone is superior to all, due to being the noblest, quickest and strongest.”
~Translated by Mary Curtis
Changing the Relationship of the Opposition
When two blades come into opposition changing the point of contact can increase or decrease your strength in the engagement. Within the Spanish system this would be increasing or decreasing the degree of the sword.
In German longsword the practice of lifting the weapon to change a weak engagement to a stronger one is called ‘Winding’. The Spanish have a similar concept called a Movement of Increase. If both fencers start with equal engagement, Ettenhard tells us that by lifting the weapon and carrying it into the line of offense we can strengthen our engagement.
Ettenhard’s Compendium… p.119 (1675)
|“…the movement of increase, which is made in order to graduate the sword. Since for this reason more strength is acquired and increased, it is appropriately given this name but not because it is of a different type from the ones mentioned in the principles that have been defined, since this action falls (with more certainty than to any other) to the mixed movement aligning lateral and violent.”
~Translated by Mary Curtis
In contrast, moving from a strong engagement to a weaker one is called a Movement of Decrease. If both fencers start with equal engagement, then by lowering the weapon and moving away from the line of offense we weaken our engagement.
Ettenhard’s Compendium… p.119 (1675)
|“The movement of decrease is the one that is made in order to reduce the strength, disgraduating the sword, whose action belongs legitimately to the mixed movement of offline lateral and natural…”
~Translated by Mary Curtis
This again reinforces that the high line provides the greatest advantage and that engagement from below is considered weaker by the Spanish tradition.
A Riddle of Inertia, Momentum, and Energy
It might be best to consider a fencer’s riddle and then examine some physics to provide us with an answer.
Riddle: How can you parry a greatsword with a dagger?
DANGER: A Bit More Physics…
Inertia is an object’s resistance to a change in the state of its motion. Any object that is not moving requires force to accelerate it. For example, to swing a cut you will apply a force to the weapon to accelerate it towards the adversary’s head. If we ignore rotational motion in this discussion, the required force is defined as:
Force = (mass of sword) x (acceleration)
In order to decelerate or stop a moving object you have to apply the same type of force.
Momentum is defined as the product of velocity and mass which does not provide us much perspective into its effect in swordplay, but it is useful for determining behavior during collisions because momentum is conserved. That means that a heavy object moving very quickly (like a greatsword) that is forcibly stopped by a smaller one will transfer momentum to the smaller object.
Momentum = (mass of sword) x (sword velocity)
Kinetic Energy tells us how much energy is delivered with an attack. The most important element in delivering a powerful attack is the velocity as shown here:
Kinetic Energy = 1/2 x (mass of sword) x (sword velocity) x (sword velocity)
By plugging in some numbers we can see how this might turn out. First, we can weight the two equally as shown here:
Kinetic Energy = 1/2 x (2) x (2) x (2) = 4
If we double the mass we achieve an increase in energy as shown here:
Kinetic Energy = 1/2 x (4) x (2) x (2) =8
If we instead double the velocity we achieve a much more powerful attack:
Kinetic Energy = 1/2 x (2) x (4) x (4) =16
Carranza Answers the Riddle
In Carranza’s Philosophy on folio 180 we see an odd figure with a dagger, a sword, a hand, and a head surrounded by geometric figures. (This is one of only six figures in the treatise.)
Carranza's Analogy for Momentum, Inertia, and Energy (Click for High Resolution)
If you close one eye and lift your index finger, holding it away from your face like the man in the image, it obscures only a very tiny portion of your sight. As you bring your finger back towards your eye (the source of your sight) it becomes larger and obscures more. If your finger is close enough to the origin, it can block out your entire view. What this tells us is that even a tiny finger can obscure a large object when it intercepts the vision at the beginning.
Carranza uses this as an analogy to tell us that in the same way, even a dagger can parry a powerful greatsword if it intercepts the cut close to the beginning of the attack. (Looking at the image above you can imagine intercepting the attack where it begins at the point labeled N.) Because the velocity is close to zero it is easy to halt (Inertia), the Momentum is low, and the Kinetic Energy delivered at the beginning of the cut is also very low.
If you intercept the same cut at the point labeled O, the velocity of the attack has increased and your parry can easily fail.
Riddle: How can you parry a greatsword with a dagger?
Carranza’s Philosophy… f.180 (1675)
|“These movements are weak in all their beginnings,… “
~Translated by Mary Curtis
Answer: Parry the attack when the velocity is zero or very low.
I have used the physics described by Isaac Newton’s Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica to explain some of the different aspects of how a sword functions but this text wasn’t published until 1687. The equation for kinetic energy was not discovered until 1829 by a French mathematician named Gustave Coriolis. Even considering that the fencing masters of Spain used the physics and motion described by classical authors like Aristotle, they knew qualitatively how weapons moved in combat which provides their work with a high level of sophistication.